Blog Post

Are Trade Shows on the Sales or Marketing Side of the Aisle?

I think you’ll agree that most sales and marketing people have very different personalities and depending on corporate culture, management styles and direction, the important functions they direct and manage can either work together in harmony or be very challenging especially for successful trade show exhibit planning and participation.

In many corporations, the trade show exhibit program is considered, managed and budgeted as a marketing support function and usually reports to either a marketing, marketing communications or advertising manager. Trade show exhibiting joins the advertising, public relations, sales promotion and sales support departments as a marketing activity and there in lies the potential for friction and general disagreements with a sales team’s needs, philosophies and performance mandate.

In his book the The Gamesman H. Maccoby, developed from his extensive research and interviews with corporate America, four types of organizational personalities: the craftsperson, the organizational person, the jungle fighter and the gamesman. His focus states that no one is purely of one type, but rather a mixture depending on the circumstances and challenges confronting each during the course of daily management responsibilities and business pressures.

The same can be said for the personalities of marketing and sales people when faced with challenges and every day business situations, however, there is a difference between the two and those dynamics often show themselves when faced with the tasks of trade show planning and successfully executing exhibit functions on the show floor.

Although the personality traits of each discipline may often blend with top management’s insistence on team cooperation and focus on overall company success, in reality, each person’s daily tasks and responsibilities tend to follow along department lines and philosophies. Simply stated, the marketing people do what they are directed to do and the sales people do what they directed to do.

Much of marketing’s personality is based on strategic thinking and planning. Tasks often include market research, competitive analysis, product introduction program development and the design of selected communications and advertising campaigns. Marketing communications, web development, direct mail, print advertising and public relations activities are all a part of the marketing department’s mix of duties and responsibilities.

According to Robert A. Grayson, author of the book Introduction to Marketing, “Marketing is a commercial process which attends and facilitates the movement of goods and services through the economy to enlarge and satisfy consumer needs consistent with the corporation’s fundamental objectives.” While Grayson goes on to list most of the functions and tools of the marketing mix, he does not list the actual face to face tactical selling function which is usually confined to and the sole responsibility of the sales team.

The early development of the corporate marketing function as we know it was accomplished at Procter and Gamble when in 1879 they introduced Ivory soap to the consumer masses. It wasn’t until the late 1920s that Proctor and Gamble’s concept of a brand management system began to take shape. This innovative marketing organization was officially created in 1931 and was based on competing brands managed by dedicated groups of marketing people. The new system provided more specialized consumer marketing strategies for each brand and Procter & Gamble's famous brand or product management system was born and copied today by many successful corporations.

Since then, Proctor and Gamble has successfully introduced main stays in the consumer world including: Crest toothpaste, Crisco cooking oil, Head and Shoulders shampoo and Old Spice after shave lotion to name a few.

While working at Memorex, management decided to enter the audio tape business which was then dominated by 3M and they cleverly hired a team of Proctor and Gamble marketing executives to head up the new consumer audio tape division. It didn’t take these experts long to develop the ingenious advertising campaign, “Is it live or Memorex? Reproduction so true it can shatter glass”, at Leo Burnett Advertising in Chicago and within one year commandeered almost 14 % of the world wide audio tape business away from a dazed 3M Corporation.

That innovative program was an excellent example of successful consumer marketing directed by a team of professional marketers who knew how to develop and launch a new consumer product using the science of “pull through” marketing they learned so well at Proctor and Gamble.

In contrast to the extremely successful consumer audio tape division’s accomplishments against 3M, Memorex’s business to business divisions who were pitted against IBM and other computer mainframe manufacturers were struggling to survive. This untenable situation provided a poignant appreciation of the unique differences between consumer and business to business marketing effectiveness.

Consumer product marketing teams, like those developed by Proctor and Gamble, are the foundation of many of today’s successful corporations where consumers are driven by advertising to stocking retailers to purchase featured products. The activity of selling actually takes place in the executive offices of various retailers who are pitched to assign their valuable retail shelf space to heavily media supported new products.

Business to business marketing however, is quite different in the fact that few customer individuals are able to purchase capital products without formal authorization from their purchasing people and it often requires sales people making field sales calls to present, demonstrate, negotiate and earn a purchase order for the products they represent.

The personalities of sales and marketing people with regards to tactical trade show exhibiting are very unique and today’s exhibit manager might want to better understand the differences to appreciate their individual motivations, character traits and operational styles in an effort to foster excellent working relationships between the two.

Simply stated, marketing people tend to be more strategic, conservative and long term thinkers, while sales people are often considered more tactical, short term thinkers, action oriented and impatient with concepts that don’t promise deliver immediate sales results.

The selling function in many corporations is more immediate and tactical and many salespeople’s personalities are different from those working in the more strategic marketing areas. Most sales people enjoy the challenge and freedom associated with their ability to earn what they’re worth and often excel when matched against the competition.

Sales, however, has a major disadvantage of being judged, much like looking at the score board at a sporting event, where their sales can be viewed, measured and evaluated at almost any point in time and no matter how well they’ve done, their fame and fortune often only lasts as long as their last sale. “So, what have you sold for us today?” are simple words that usually send chills down a salespersons spine.

The marketing function is usually managed by strategic people who enjoy research, planning, developing and executing programs that are deemed to be well thought out and usually unfold over time; while sales are important, there are other quantitative, qualitative results and analysis that are viewed as equally important that might add to the research, development and success of future marketing programs.

I’ve worked on both sides of the sales and marketing aisle and found both to be challenging and rewarding. As a salesman in the field, I was motivated by learning the professional approach to successfully selling, meeting or exceeding my monthly sales targets and making as much money as I could while enjoying being responsible for managing my own time and resources.

The corporate marketing side of my experience calmed me down a bit and forced me to become more systematic and strategic and less anxious to sell more products faster. The corporate environment seemed to require me to become more sophisticated, less frantic and more professional where time was measured more in business quarters instead of weeks, months or days as was the case when I was a salesman in the field.

Also, while working in marketing, I appreciated not working in the pressure packed environment of sales and being asked by almost anyone in management, how my sales to target looked. How close I thought I’d come to making my sales numbers and/or how much business I expected to close within any given period of time.

Any sales team’s performance can be judged on a daily basis, whereas marketing has more time to adjust to market trends, purchasing cycles and various product issues. This dynamic often creates an environment of discomfort among sales and marketing people and in many cases exposes the underlying tension that exists between the two just below the surface.

For me, the many lessons learned while working in the sales and marketing departments of large corporations culminated when I was asked to join OrCAD Systems Corporation, a new start up Software Company where I assumed Vice President level responsibility for both sales and marketing.

I quickly found myself required to effectively blend the strategies of marketing with the tactics of sales and did so successfully by first attempting to sell product and then using whatever results learned to better identify and utilize various additional marketing support tools to pave the way to greater sales.

I began developing a mental outline for the “Bridging the Gap Between Trade Shows and Sales” presentation and realized that my opportunity to further study the FASEB exhibit from high above the show floor was a gift. I spent most of the rest of the show in the seats above the show floor observing, taking notes and building a comprehensive outline for my new exciting presentation.

In addition to watching our newly energized booth personnel (now personally led by our Vice President of Sales) interact with suspects, prospects and customers, I began to notice how the exhibit functioned in communicating and realized that long before the attendee entered the exhibit he/she would prefer to stand in the aisle to read our various signs.

OrCAD’s trade shows were focused on sales and generating quality sales leads. The leads were rated cold-warm-hot and were followed up on one week following the show. Each lead card distributed had hand written notes of the exchange and the rating identified by the interviewer indicated the level of buying interest. It was also known by the field sales team members that I would call leads at random soon after the show to confirm that they were contacted and satisfied with the way they were serviced.

Contrary to OrCAD’s trade show sales lead system, a client of mine first used a give-away promotion to build booth traffic and after hearing “I just wanted to win the drawing” from leads distributed after the show, the sales team didn’t waste their time following up on any of that show’s leads because the quality just wasn’t there and the promise of making a sale didn’t exist.

The trade show is a unique tactical, face to face sales event, staged for two or three days which presents an exhibitor with an entire market of suspects, prospects and customers considering the purchase of products and services. The success or failure of a company’s trade show effort is usually judged by how effectively the leads were generated, followed up on and new sales booked.

The Challenge

The challenge for many trade show managers is to create and foster a cooperative planning environment where the dynamics of tactical sales and strategic marketing personalities can work together to contribute their individual talents and perspectives in reaching for new levels of trade show sales success.

Trade show training
By Peter Locascio November 9, 2023
The Annual Convention with Trade Show
By Peter LoCascio August 4, 2022
Over the years as a trade show exhibiting consultant, I have been asked by many what my opinion was on what it takes to become successful at managing trade show exhibiting for corporations. While it’s often difficult to assume what “success” means for someone else, I can share with you what it meant to me to be a successful corporate exhibits manager when I worked at Sperry UNIVAC, MEMOREX, and Beckman Instruments. Additionally, as I climbed the corporate ladder, trade show exhibiting remained a primary focal point for me in the marketing and sales areas at Kawasaki, Tektronix and especially OrCAD Systems Corp, a bootstrapped startup where the challenge of keeping the doors open existed every day. 
By Peter LoCascio November 15, 2021
A client recently asked me to help them better define the duties and responsibilities of a trade show exhibits manager as part of their search to fill a newly created position within their sales and marketing departments. To begin, I needed to know their answers to a few key questions that would serve as a solid foundation. From there, I could begin to fill in some of the blanks and, in the end, deliver to them what they needed. In an effort for them to hire the right person for the job, I had to picture myself in the position and imagine how I might approach the job for the benefits of both the corporation and myself. I also wanted to ensure that we were all working on the same page when it came to the job’s title, compensation, duties and responsibilities. Here are some of the questions I asked: Who would this position directly report to? This was key, because as I’ve stated many times, marketing and sales are very different. I believe marketing is more strategic and sales is more tactical in their approach to running a business. Marketing could approach exhibiting at trade shows differently than the sales department would, and that difference might lead to misunderstandings and make the job of the trade show exhibits manager job more difficult. How many trade shows are on the schedule each year and where are they? Shows held domestically require one type of planning, while international shows require another level of planning and executional logistics to ensure success. Knowing this up front is important for someone in the role of trade show exhibits manager. How are exhibiting budgets developed and what is included? For instance, is trade show travel and per diem for booth staff included? What exactly is charged to the trade show exhibit budget, and does the trade show manager have responsibility and authority to manage it all? How active is top management in the early planning of trade show exhibiting and who decides how much exhibit space is needed? It’s incredibly helpful to know who is responsible for selecting the exhibit space, which company products or services are displayed and how much space is dedicated to each. Is there a purchasing department representative assigned to work directly with the trade show exhibits manager to ensure that expenditures are managed according to approved corporate guidelines? Are there key major trade shows the manager will be required to travel to and work the booth for the entire show, including setup and dismantling? Does the trade show exhibits manager have to attend all secondary shows or can he/she arrange to have the sales or marketing staff handle them? Who decides who is selected to work the booth during the show? Who selects the booth captains, and how much authority does the trade show exhibits manager have to manage their performance? Have the most important trade shows been effectively planned at least six months prior to a show, including all stakeholders, to ensure continuity of strategies, tactics and accurate expectations? Are the exhibit materials stored on site or in a vendor’s warehouse? Is there a dedicated exhibit fabricator and service provider on contract? Is the company satisfied with their service and costs? How are the exhibit materials and products shipped to and from trade show facilities? Is hall labor used to setup and dismantle the exhibit or does the exhibit provider include labor? What kind of trade show exhibit inquiry/sales lead process is used to generate, qualify and manage leads during and after the show? Who is responsible for managing this function? Who is responsible for making travel arrangements for company staff attending and working the trade show exhibit? Is a corporate suite at a local hotel used as the company headquarters where staff can meet before, during and after the show to coordinate activities, gather intelligence and meet with key prospects and customers? Who is responsible for managing this function, and are the costs charged to the trade show exhibit budget? Is a pre-show meeting planned the evening before the show to review exhibiting goals, objectives and booth layout while presenting product-specific marketing and sales details? Is there a post-show report created and distributed to stakeholders covering what worked and what needs to be improved soon after each show? This information should set the stage for improving problem areas while maintaining and building on areas that worked well and should be implemented at the next shows. One of the most important suggestions I made was that the trade show exhibits manager must assume both the responsibility and accountability for all aspects of exhibiting using the budget as a guideline. There should be no charges assigned to the trade show exhibiting budget without the manager’s knowledge and ability with authority to directly manage them. A final important point is that both compensation and time management should allow for the trade show exhibits manager to stay at every major trade show to work the booth alongside sales, marketing, management and technical support for the duration of the show. Allowing a trade show exhibits manager to assume total responsibility and accountability for successfully managing all aspects of trade show exhibiting will ensure that the person in the role is respected and valued as an important sales and marketing function. Peter LoCascio Founder Trade Show Consultants
By Peter Locascio September 1, 2021
While many exhibitors understand the value of placing their best foot forward with regards to their trade show exhibit materials, many might do better to meet the challenges of maximizing their effectiveness by more adequately focusing on various important non-exhibit entities. Far beyond the creatively painted and brightly illuminated exhibit materials placed on the trade show floor, there exist many additional aspects of trade show exhibiting that will often spell the difference between success and disappointment. First and foremost, in considering what constitutes a successful trade shows exhibit presentation is the fact that on the show floor, people will want to do business with people and not with inanimate objects like exhibits, graphics, products or sales literature. The trade show environment is one of creating an opportunity for human contact and at which the exhibit merely creates an environment conducive for people to meet each other to conduct business. The physical dynamics of trade show exhibiting are intensified and extremely more complex when compared to most any other forms of corporate business communications. This is for the most part due to the presence of the other exhibitors all competing for the attention, time and consideration of key show attendees, prospects and customers. What, in reality, does the trade show attendee see when he/she approaches your exhibit? The perception could be the difference between entering Tiffany’s or a K-mart and it all depends on the total picture presented and perceived that indicates the kind of company you are, including its products, people and business policies. A complete image of your company is presented the moment the attendee, prospect or customer notices and walks towards your exhibit on the show floor. Directly under the surface of the bright lights, flashing signs, product presentations and sales people wearing their best welcoming smiles the perception of the image of your company is created. Within a few short minutes your total trade show exhibit presentation will begin to indicate to prospects and customers your corporate culture, philosophies and level of business dedication. The professionalism of your people, products and commitment to customer service will be expressed, evaluated and actively compared against every one of your competitors on the show floor. In essence, who you are what you stand for and how you appear to do business is projected and vividly on display representing an image from the day your company was created to present time. If your most important corporate trade show were a sporting event, it could compare to your own World Series, Super Bowl and World Cup all rolled into one three day tournament under one roof of a major convention center. The question is, are you prepared?
By Peter LoCascio May 7, 2020
For years, advances in technology have stimulated the imaginations of professional association management, trade show producers and exhibitors with the concept and possibilities of staging virtual conventions, meetings and trade shows. As online data speeds increased, device capabilities advanced, and the world’s connectivity became a reality, the possibility questions were usually answered with some doubt, traditional thinking and a general lack of enthusiasm. Complicated technology issues, connectivity application software confusion, device compatibility, appropriate content development and a general lack of knowledge all played a part in the idea quickly reverting to the axiom of “don’t fix it if it isn’t broken.” There were way too many tried and true financial, social and common-sense human benefits supporting the convention, trade show, and meeting worlds to consider any new virtual concept that few saw as technically viable, socially acceptable and cost effective. The idea of virtual annual conventions with technical paper presentations, workshops and lectures, supported by something of an inanimate trade show floor where exhibitors’ products and services were presented was far beyond the realm of possibility, reality and acceptance. A professional association’s annual convention with trade show support is traditional, significant and historic. It’s where members within all segments of an industry gather together to learn and share the latest knowledge, technology and industry insights. What could possibly disrupt such a time honored, viable, successful and valuable enterprise?
A Case for Effective Trade Show Giveaways
By Peter LoCascio November 18, 2019
OrCAD Systems Corporation was a bootstrapped, non-funded startup in Hillsboro, Oregon, providing electronic design engineers with PC based CAE tools at a time when such design tools were mostly available only on higher powered expensive workstations.
Modern Trade Show Exhibiting with Kaizen
By Peter LoCascio October 15, 2019
By improving standardized programs and processes, kaizen aims to eliminate waste. Kaizen was first practiced in Japanese businesses after World War II, influenced in part by American business and quality-management teachers, and most notably as part of the Toyota Way.
By Peter Locascio August 28, 2017
Effective top management evaluates various marketing and sales support functions, along with their related expenditures in time and money, by asking middle management to justify each activity based on results.
By Peter Locascio May 19, 2017
Effective trade show exhibiting management is not easy or glamorous, and while you might spend six months planning required logistics of exhibiting, once the show opens, all of your work becomes subjected to others’ opinions, suggestions and comments — and not all are always complimentary.
By Peter Locascio May 18, 2017
While the Clinton campaign went about the more traditional tasks of evaluating past voter analytics, developing messaging and using research tools like focus groups and polling analysis to develop their positioning statements, Donald Trump was out in the field making human contact at hundreds of live events, learning firsthand what was on people’s minds and in their hearts.
More Posts
Share by: