Blog Post

The Origin of “Bridging the Gap Between Trade Shows and Sales

Years ago, when I was Beckman Instrument’s Corporate Manager of Trade Shows and Exhibits, one of the first critical challenges to my career arrived while we were exhibiting at Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB). It was our most important show of the year, then staged at the Auditorium in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

Our exhibit presentation was carefully created within two 20’x 40’ island exhibit booths complete with a full line of very sophisticated Bio-medical research instruments that were supported by a large competent staff of highly trained sales, marketing and technical support experts.

The price tag for this event alone was in the range of hundreds of thousands of dollars -- it was viewed by our top corporate and divisional managers as one of year’s most important sales and marketing functions in this somewhat esoteric market.

It was also acknowledged that only through staging a successful FASEB exhibit effort would Beckman’s Bio-Medical Research business be able to increase its bottom line by generating enough quality sales leads resulting in increased sales and profits during the year that followed. It was estimated that about 10% of the total attending audience were key targeted prospects.

What made the FASEB trade show so valuable to Beckman Instruments and other suppliers to the Bio-medical research industry was the fact that their customers came to them: most sales teams found it almost impossible to actually get in and visit individual Bio-medical researchers in their laboratories where the scientists spend most of their time. Yet the typically private scientists would, however, attend the FASEB annual convention to share ideas, attend papers, workshops and technical seminars and then browse the exhibit hall to learn what was new in the way of promising products and services offered.

Only on the FASEB trade show exhibit floor was it possible for exhibitors to meet key research prospects and formally demonstrate their product’s features and capabilities. The positive environment was also conducive to sharing often complex product application knowledge with a receptive attendee who had time to spend and was motivated by his/her quest for new product knowledge to solve their pressing research challenges.

In the field, there were many problems associated with efforts to ship, setup and effectively demonstrate sensitive scientific instruments in the researcher’s laboratory. Many instruments were too large and difficult to accurately calibrate for them to perform with any guarantee of success. The FASEB show turned out to be the best way to effectively present and demonstrate the most sophisticated instruments to this highly select audience.

At 9:00 AM on Tuesday morning, after three solid days of set-up, the auditorium doors opened and the show was officially underway. After an hour or so when the booth was running smoothly, I went up into the seats that surrounded the exhibit floor to observe how our trade show exhibit presentation was functioning as viewed from this unique vantage point.

Of all the trade shows I’ve attended over the years, few had offered an opportunity for me to observe the entire exhibit function from such an opportunistic vantage point. It was an eye- opening experience and one I found necessary to share with the Vice President of Sales later in the day when I invited him to join me to also experience how his Beckman exhibit was functioning.

While sitting in the seats overlooking the Beckman exhibit below, we traced the steps and habits of various prospects as they walked the aisles, read the signs, entered our booth, and explored some of the instruments on display. We were shocked as we watched many visitors proceed to walk out of the booth without as much as a welcome or greeting from any of our booth personnel on duty.

After an hour of watching this situation unfold, the Vice President of Sales finally couldn’t take it any longer and all but ran down the stairs and into the exhibit to see what he could do to remedy what to us was a totally unacceptable situation.

The VP’s emotionally upsetting experience of observing our exhibit and realizing that we were virtually ignoring and turning away important prospects resulted in a mandatory emergency meeting that night, where he voiced his displeasure with the booth function and solicited input to quickly solve the problem.

The results of that dynamically charged session included immediate changes in the way the booth personnel functioned with regards to identifying, meeting, greeting and helping suspects, prospects and customers who entered the booth. In addition, the Vice President of Sales directed me to begin developing a comprehensive pre-show presentation that would prepare trade show booth personnel to better perform at all future Beckman trade shows.

The concept of “Bridging the Gap Between Trade Show and Sales” was born.

Being directed by and having the direct support of the Corporate Vice President of Sales and imagining that I could be a key part of initiating such dynamic changes in the way the corporation viewed and participated at trade shows was all inspiring and challenging for me.

I began developing a mental outline for the “Bridging the Gap Between Trade Shows and Sales” presentation and realized that my opportunity to further study the FASEB exhibit from high above the show floor was a gift. I spent most of the rest of the show in the seats above the show floor observing, taking notes and building a comprehensive outline for my new exciting presentation.

In addition to watching our newly energized booth personnel (now personally led by our Vice President of Sales) interact with suspects, prospects and customers, I began to notice how the exhibit functioned in communicating and realized that long before the attendee entered the exhibit he/she would prefer to stand in the aisle to read our various signs.

I deduced that this was done in an attempt to avoid being approached by usually aggressive booth sales personnel before he/she was ready to initiate contact. However, the prospect would welcome contact and information after a particular product of interest was identified.

It seemed reasonable for me to think that if the exhibit’s signage could be modified to improve communications, it might do a much better job at helping screen attendees from the aisle and deliver more confident prospects seeking additional product specific information from our booth staff.

It was also a startling revelation for me to consider that while the exhibit had to communicate to our targeted prospects (which we often estimated at about 10% of the total attendance) so they could decide to enter the booth, it also had to effectively communicate to keep about 90% of our non-targeted attendees away from entering the booth and taking up the booth team’s limited valuable time.

One of the key elements in creating “Bridging the Gap Between Trade Show and Sales” was to offer a common sense approach to exhibiting and providing booth personnel with simple concepts for them to embrace.

Improving exhibit signage to function better in screening attendees and delivering key prospects from the aisles to the exhibit and waiting sales team hit the mark. The results of this simple concept was integrated into the presentation suggesting that our booth personnel can now relax and allow the exhibit to do the initial screening of attendees while delivering a prospect who knew which exhibit, product category and exact product he/she was most interested in learning more about.

The exhibit’s new graphic presentation, as seen from the aisle, successfully communicated who we were, which product category was under a color coded sub-heading, the product’s name, its features and benefits, the actual product on display and finally who the prospect could talk to for more information.

This innovation alone helped future Beckman trade show booth duty personnel feel more in control, confident and useful because they were now in a position to help screened prospects obtain the important information they needed to make important buying decisions.

Another segment of the “Bridging the Gap Between Trade Show and Sales” presentation focused on the verbal portion of the exhibit presentation and included how the booth personnel should meet, greet and present products of interest while taking care to acquire as much information as possible for effective and timely post show follow-up.

“Bridging the Gap Between Trade Shows and Sales” has continued to evolve over the years and is now in a flexible PowerPoint format, which lends itself to individual customization for any exhibitor who finds the need to further advance the trade show function as it relates to sales.

According to Therese Solimeno, Smart Dame Event Marketing, San Luis Obispo, CA, “I witnessed first-hand how the “Bridging the Gap Between Trade Shows and Sales” presentation advanced Beckman’s trade show program and have since employed those techniques with clients like Microsoft. Now that the presentation is available for individual exhibitor customization, I recommend it to all of my clients to use as a tool to improve their trade show results.”

While the experience at Beckman Instruments advanced my career in ways I could not have imagined, much of my success would not have been possible without the fiery commitment of the Corporate Vice President of Sales and the inspiration we gained high above the Atlantic City Auditorium exhibit floor at FASEB those many years ago.

Trade show training
By Peter Locascio November 9, 2023
The Annual Convention with Trade Show
By Peter LoCascio August 4, 2022
Over the years as a trade show exhibiting consultant, I have been asked by many what my opinion was on what it takes to become successful at managing trade show exhibiting for corporations. While it’s often difficult to assume what “success” means for someone else, I can share with you what it meant to me to be a successful corporate exhibits manager when I worked at Sperry UNIVAC, MEMOREX, and Beckman Instruments. Additionally, as I climbed the corporate ladder, trade show exhibiting remained a primary focal point for me in the marketing and sales areas at Kawasaki, Tektronix and especially OrCAD Systems Corp, a bootstrapped startup where the challenge of keeping the doors open existed every day. 
By Peter LoCascio November 15, 2021
A client recently asked me to help them better define the duties and responsibilities of a trade show exhibits manager as part of their search to fill a newly created position within their sales and marketing departments. To begin, I needed to know their answers to a few key questions that would serve as a solid foundation. From there, I could begin to fill in some of the blanks and, in the end, deliver to them what they needed. In an effort for them to hire the right person for the job, I had to picture myself in the position and imagine how I might approach the job for the benefits of both the corporation and myself. I also wanted to ensure that we were all working on the same page when it came to the job’s title, compensation, duties and responsibilities. Here are some of the questions I asked: Who would this position directly report to? This was key, because as I’ve stated many times, marketing and sales are very different. I believe marketing is more strategic and sales is more tactical in their approach to running a business. Marketing could approach exhibiting at trade shows differently than the sales department would, and that difference might lead to misunderstandings and make the job of the trade show exhibits manager job more difficult. How many trade shows are on the schedule each year and where are they? Shows held domestically require one type of planning, while international shows require another level of planning and executional logistics to ensure success. Knowing this up front is important for someone in the role of trade show exhibits manager. How are exhibiting budgets developed and what is included? For instance, is trade show travel and per diem for booth staff included? What exactly is charged to the trade show exhibit budget, and does the trade show manager have responsibility and authority to manage it all? How active is top management in the early planning of trade show exhibiting and who decides how much exhibit space is needed? It’s incredibly helpful to know who is responsible for selecting the exhibit space, which company products or services are displayed and how much space is dedicated to each. Is there a purchasing department representative assigned to work directly with the trade show exhibits manager to ensure that expenditures are managed according to approved corporate guidelines? Are there key major trade shows the manager will be required to travel to and work the booth for the entire show, including setup and dismantling? Does the trade show exhibits manager have to attend all secondary shows or can he/she arrange to have the sales or marketing staff handle them? Who decides who is selected to work the booth during the show? Who selects the booth captains, and how much authority does the trade show exhibits manager have to manage their performance? Have the most important trade shows been effectively planned at least six months prior to a show, including all stakeholders, to ensure continuity of strategies, tactics and accurate expectations? Are the exhibit materials stored on site or in a vendor’s warehouse? Is there a dedicated exhibit fabricator and service provider on contract? Is the company satisfied with their service and costs? How are the exhibit materials and products shipped to and from trade show facilities? Is hall labor used to setup and dismantle the exhibit or does the exhibit provider include labor? What kind of trade show exhibit inquiry/sales lead process is used to generate, qualify and manage leads during and after the show? Who is responsible for managing this function? Who is responsible for making travel arrangements for company staff attending and working the trade show exhibit? Is a corporate suite at a local hotel used as the company headquarters where staff can meet before, during and after the show to coordinate activities, gather intelligence and meet with key prospects and customers? Who is responsible for managing this function, and are the costs charged to the trade show exhibit budget? Is a pre-show meeting planned the evening before the show to review exhibiting goals, objectives and booth layout while presenting product-specific marketing and sales details? Is there a post-show report created and distributed to stakeholders covering what worked and what needs to be improved soon after each show? This information should set the stage for improving problem areas while maintaining and building on areas that worked well and should be implemented at the next shows. One of the most important suggestions I made was that the trade show exhibits manager must assume both the responsibility and accountability for all aspects of exhibiting using the budget as a guideline. There should be no charges assigned to the trade show exhibiting budget without the manager’s knowledge and ability with authority to directly manage them. A final important point is that both compensation and time management should allow for the trade show exhibits manager to stay at every major trade show to work the booth alongside sales, marketing, management and technical support for the duration of the show. Allowing a trade show exhibits manager to assume total responsibility and accountability for successfully managing all aspects of trade show exhibiting will ensure that the person in the role is respected and valued as an important sales and marketing function. Peter LoCascio Founder Trade Show Consultants
By Peter Locascio September 1, 2021
While many exhibitors understand the value of placing their best foot forward with regards to their trade show exhibit materials, many might do better to meet the challenges of maximizing their effectiveness by more adequately focusing on various important non-exhibit entities. Far beyond the creatively painted and brightly illuminated exhibit materials placed on the trade show floor, there exist many additional aspects of trade show exhibiting that will often spell the difference between success and disappointment. First and foremost, in considering what constitutes a successful trade shows exhibit presentation is the fact that on the show floor, people will want to do business with people and not with inanimate objects like exhibits, graphics, products or sales literature. The trade show environment is one of creating an opportunity for human contact and at which the exhibit merely creates an environment conducive for people to meet each other to conduct business. The physical dynamics of trade show exhibiting are intensified and extremely more complex when compared to most any other forms of corporate business communications. This is for the most part due to the presence of the other exhibitors all competing for the attention, time and consideration of key show attendees, prospects and customers. What, in reality, does the trade show attendee see when he/she approaches your exhibit? The perception could be the difference between entering Tiffany’s or a K-mart and it all depends on the total picture presented and perceived that indicates the kind of company you are, including its products, people and business policies. A complete image of your company is presented the moment the attendee, prospect or customer notices and walks towards your exhibit on the show floor. Directly under the surface of the bright lights, flashing signs, product presentations and sales people wearing their best welcoming smiles the perception of the image of your company is created. Within a few short minutes your total trade show exhibit presentation will begin to indicate to prospects and customers your corporate culture, philosophies and level of business dedication. The professionalism of your people, products and commitment to customer service will be expressed, evaluated and actively compared against every one of your competitors on the show floor. In essence, who you are what you stand for and how you appear to do business is projected and vividly on display representing an image from the day your company was created to present time. If your most important corporate trade show were a sporting event, it could compare to your own World Series, Super Bowl and World Cup all rolled into one three day tournament under one roof of a major convention center. The question is, are you prepared?
By Peter LoCascio May 7, 2020
For years, advances in technology have stimulated the imaginations of professional association management, trade show producers and exhibitors with the concept and possibilities of staging virtual conventions, meetings and trade shows. As online data speeds increased, device capabilities advanced, and the world’s connectivity became a reality, the possibility questions were usually answered with some doubt, traditional thinking and a general lack of enthusiasm. Complicated technology issues, connectivity application software confusion, device compatibility, appropriate content development and a general lack of knowledge all played a part in the idea quickly reverting to the axiom of “don’t fix it if it isn’t broken.” There were way too many tried and true financial, social and common-sense human benefits supporting the convention, trade show, and meeting worlds to consider any new virtual concept that few saw as technically viable, socially acceptable and cost effective. The idea of virtual annual conventions with technical paper presentations, workshops and lectures, supported by something of an inanimate trade show floor where exhibitors’ products and services were presented was far beyond the realm of possibility, reality and acceptance. A professional association’s annual convention with trade show support is traditional, significant and historic. It’s where members within all segments of an industry gather together to learn and share the latest knowledge, technology and industry insights. What could possibly disrupt such a time honored, viable, successful and valuable enterprise?
A Case for Effective Trade Show Giveaways
By Peter LoCascio November 18, 2019
OrCAD Systems Corporation was a bootstrapped, non-funded startup in Hillsboro, Oregon, providing electronic design engineers with PC based CAE tools at a time when such design tools were mostly available only on higher powered expensive workstations.
Modern Trade Show Exhibiting with Kaizen
By Peter LoCascio October 15, 2019
By improving standardized programs and processes, kaizen aims to eliminate waste. Kaizen was first practiced in Japanese businesses after World War II, influenced in part by American business and quality-management teachers, and most notably as part of the Toyota Way.
By Peter Locascio August 28, 2017
Effective top management evaluates various marketing and sales support functions, along with their related expenditures in time and money, by asking middle management to justify each activity based on results.
By Peter Locascio May 19, 2017
Effective trade show exhibiting management is not easy or glamorous, and while you might spend six months planning required logistics of exhibiting, once the show opens, all of your work becomes subjected to others’ opinions, suggestions and comments — and not all are always complimentary.
By Peter Locascio May 18, 2017
While the Clinton campaign went about the more traditional tasks of evaluating past voter analytics, developing messaging and using research tools like focus groups and polling analysis to develop their positioning statements, Donald Trump was out in the field making human contact at hundreds of live events, learning firsthand what was on people’s minds and in their hearts.
More Posts
Share by: